Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Electoral Reform committee —that another system yields naturally more women. It doesn't, and I'll point you to another example.
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'll simply say that in Ontario there has been a dramatic increase in the number of female MPs, and that's been done under a first past the post system. If the parties are serious about making sure that women are well represented, then they should run more
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee It's coincidence; it's not causal.
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee It's coincidence.
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee Run more women as candidates.
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee I'll say this about what would likely happen in that kind of scenario. If the government unilaterally changes the rules by which Canadians elect their Parliament, and if this is accepted, you are going to be setting a precedent whereby the next government can change the rules als
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee I always see complications with the other systems. At the end of the day, I'm not sure what they bring to the table that's fundamentally different, if you have a larger riding and have three members of Parliament for it and all three of them from different affiliations, rather th
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee Mr. Deltell, I'll give you a single example: the riding creation, in 1917, and the electoral system distortions at the hands of the Conservative government and the Unionist government. Otherwise, in most cases, there is justification for the policies that were chosen by governmen
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee What I meant was that we want a Parliament that will support a government, where the government is responsible and where it can get the support of a majority in Parliament. Whether it comes from one party or a variety of parties doesn't really matter. You want to have a system th
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee There is no argument against the convention. When the Supreme Court of Canada was asked in 1981, they said these conventions matter and the Government of Canada has to abide by those conventions, the government has to work to build substantial agreement among the provinces. The g
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee All right, I'll come back to it.
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee Peter Hogg said, in his Constitutional Law of Canada, “there is a stronger moral obligation to follow a convention than a usage, and that departure from convention may be criticized more severely than departure from usage.” Convention matters.
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee Depending on what is being proposed, the Supreme Court would have to make a decision and determine whether it applies or not. I think it's very hard to predict at this point what they would finally decide. I find this Supreme Court particularly difficult to decipher anyway. But I
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee We don't have any data on cynicism. It's important to recognize that. As a trained historian, I tend to put things into context historically. Having read what politicians experienced in the past, I don't have the sense that people are more cynical today than they used to be. Th
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil
Electoral Reform committee Yes. I just don't like proportional systems. I'm afraid that proportional systems focus—
July 26th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Patrice Dutil