Industry committee  Yes.

Industry committee  Let's make no mistake. Legitimate companies spam, too. They do, all the time. Matt and I have been doing it for 20 years. The amount of non-compliance among legitimate companies is high. CASL has put a stop to that. On Internet of things updates, I think we could talk for hours,

Industry committee  That was one of my talking points, that we were the last country in the G8 to adopt an anti-spam law. It's embarrassing that some would like to do away with the law. It's an excellent law, and it's one that is respected as the best in the world among my colleagues. Absolutely it

Industry committee  The IoT software update issue has been misstated a little bit to this committee and perhaps misunderstood more generally. Once you install a piece of software and they throw up the terms of service to a net user, they also accept, if the terms of service are written correctly, th

Industry committee  It would not hurt us. It would benefit us and IoT is a lurking giant that should scare us all.

Industry committee  I think that's an excellent question. There's no denying that I have some open fears about people misusing the law. We didn't intend it to be a cash cow for litigious frivolities. Mr. Vernhout has stated CAUCE's opinion. Our stance is that network operators should be allowed to a

Industry committee  Yes, precisely. I think we've also heard from the Privacy Commissioner and others about some reasonable sculpting, which makes it less...in fact while I rarely find myself in agreement with Ms. Morin, I have to agree that the “false and misleading” is very vague, and there absolu

Industry committee  Absolutely. With apologies to the Bard of Avon, friends, parliamentarians, countrymen, lend me your ears; I come to praise CASL, not to kill it. The evil that critics of CASL do lives with them; the good is oft imbued in its sections; so let it be with CASL. CASL's noble adver