Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-21 of 21
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  The difference is that if you do it the way I'm suggesting, almost all of your charter concerns evaporate, because now if there is new evidence in the second case--let's say it's the second Hells Angels case, for ease of reference--that wasn't presented in the first Hells Angels

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Burstein

Justice committee  But the crown can prove the offence without ever having to say they're Hells Angels or they're Bandidos. In other words, it's an unnecessary label. That's the part that takes the six months, because then the crown needs to go into the history of the Hells Angels, and it's just co

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Burstein

Justice committee  Thank you. I'm sorry, you're quite right. Mr. Murphy had raised that question.There were a lot of things in his question and I was trying to address as many as I could. You have a mechanism right now and--I guess this is the one thing that I should have put in my opening remark

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Burstein

Justice committee  Let me just say briefly, in addressing one of your points, sir, that the concerns the police have about disclosure in these mega-trials will in no way, or in a very minor way, be assisted by this list. The disclosure concerns they have in terms of the resources required are still

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Burstein

Justice committee  Yes, exactly. Like everyone else from Winnipeg, apparently, I left and moved to Ontario.

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Burstein

Justice committee  Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I hope not to use my 10 minutes, because I appreciate that the committee prefers to engage in the dialogue--and I quite agree--and tends to get more out of the questions and answers. I do want to thank you for inviting me. I always enjoy coming to

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Burstein