Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Information & Ethics committee We're a Canadian organization. It's the first for us.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee Yes, absolutely. It is an irreversible process, meaning that there is no going back afterwards. Several years ago, available technology made it possible to swirl the face, but people did find a way to unswirl it and identify the individual. Now, however, we use a technology that
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee We've had zero complaints, none, not a single one. We've had a few people use the mechanism to give us suggestions, which I found pretty amusing, and many of them were good suggestions actually. So that was nice. But as for complaints, we've had none to date.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee I'll try to answer that. Indeed, we are a business, so there has to be an ultimate commercial purpose. People's silhouette appearing on our blurred images is an accident. We are not taking people's photos for commercial reasons. Actually, we don't want them in the photo. That i
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee Perhaps I could give part of the answer. I'm going to switch to English, if you don't mind, so I don't mix up my vocabulary. When you innovate, you always enter new territories, which creates questions and sometimes fears. After years of Google's Street View around the planet
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee I totally concur with Mr. Lister's statement. I would just add that in the case of shelters, which is a very sensitive case, we thought a lot about what we could do to go even further. We realized that, first of all, we have complete blurring, so privacy is guaranteed, but that i
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee Perhaps I could answer that question first. If you don't mind, I would like to come back to your previous question. I think you are right: the term “mapping” is really quite passé. Now we talk about a total immersive experience, which is much more powerful than simply showing ma
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee Yes, of course. In terms of legislation, we have looked at it at a number of different levels, starting with legal support from major Canadian firms, to be sure that we were complying with the law. Earlier, we talked about our active communication with all privacy commissioners.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee In fact, I now clearly have their approval, because we know they are using that information for their own purposes as well.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee I believe so.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee I am no legal expert, but I believe it has.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee There is no doubt that technology changes quickly and that legislation does not always keep pace. Right now, we are talking about laws that were passed long before streeting and the Internet.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee As a result, there are a few imitations. At the same time, I think these laws were drafted based on common sense, for the most part, and we try to apply that common sense in our everyday activities. I think that is quite a reasonable approach. My sense is that what Google and Ca
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee That is something you may want to consider, but I know that in our case, it has not slowed us down.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent
Information & Ethics committee It is more than that.
June 17th, 2009Committee meeting
Olivier Vincent