Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Natural Resources committee Only vaguely, because that covers a large number of pipelines that are more related to gathering and small-level pipelines, not the major transmission systems.
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee But what--
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee I think it's important to put the $5.5 billion into context and to consider the scale. I don't want to focus on Gateway, because the same could be said of expansions on the Kinder Morgan line. Either way, infrastructure investment to provide the choice of exports does not take aw
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee That question covers several different points. Let me try to respond. First of all, in terms of focusing on energy security in Canada, my own view is that it's important to keep in mind that economic development can be a tool through which we enlarge other types of energy securi
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee Starting on the question of expansion, I think you're absolutely correct in pointing to the fact that infrastructure does exist. For over 50 years there has been trade through the port of Vancouver, and that continues. The Kinder Morgan system is expandable, and even today I'm to
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee Thank you.
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee Thank you very much.
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee I haven't been in this room before--
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Natural Resources committee --and as soon as I came in this morning, I thought, boy, I hope there aren't any major Senators fans or Leaf fans out there. In any event, I am here representing the pipeline sector. I'll provide a few perspectives from the pipeline point of view. Of course, the members I repr
December 9th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Finance committee The main premise for the qualified environmental trust that currently exists just for mining is a look at long-term industries where you want to ensure that there's a stable funding mechanism in place and that there is encouragement--like the RRSP--to ensure that the savings accr
September 27th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Finance committee Currently no separate fund exists. It's about to be commenced.
September 27th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Finance committee We'll certainly do our part in it. What we're asking for is that changes to the Income Tax Act be equivalent to the mining industry and simply say that the federal government supports a tax-efficient accrual of those funds, so that as you set them aside in those savings, they're
September 27th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Finance committee It's a payment in the future. You want to make sure you have.... This is how it would work, just as any other--
September 27th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Finance committee Great. The retirement savings plans or pension plans are kind of similar entities for which you're saying you want to make sure that the right responsibility is fully covered at the time it is necessary. Realistically, in this industry we are talking about something that is five,
September 27th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny
Finance committee No, I'm sorry. I'm an engineer, so I probably misused that term. My apologies.
September 27th, 2010Committee meeting
Brenda Kenny