Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 89
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  I think it's correct.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  That's line 6. Oh, pardon me.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Pardon me; you're right. It's the numbering of the two columns that confused me.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Is that in French?

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  As I understand it, what we're talking about here is simply different drafting approaches used by our francophone and anglophone drafters. In our view, subclause 18(3), as amended, would have the same meaning in both English and French.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Sorry, but no, you're right. That should be “to line 35”, to and including line 35.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Yes, that does appear to be correct.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Yes, it was, and we think it was needlessly complex. It was even difficult to read and probably to implement.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Yes, once again, the idea is to simplify procedures. As a result of the changes approved in clause 15, we had to make changes to clause 16 and we simplified it at the same time. In spite of everything, it's really of the same nature as previously. It's merely simplified.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Yes. This was proposed by the Chairman of the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission. He noted that our biggest North American economic partner has provisions in its laws greatly encouraging and facilitating the exchange of information on offences such as tho

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  Yes. That's one example. This is also the case of Australia, and the European Union. All have laws and bills targeting exactly these problems.

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  This concerns situations where, for example, Aeroplan asks its members whether they are interested in receiving commercial messages from its partners, Avis, Sheraton or others. At the time consent is requested, the partner has not necessarily been selected, but Aeroplan can event

October 21st, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  That will be done over the six-month period. As we develop the regulations, we'll consult the industry and consumers. Education programs are planned and so we'll use the time at our disposal quite efficiently.

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  I think the main thing to be said is that this certainly attempts to be a principles-based piece of legislation, and it sets out very broad, principled guidelines for business. It is not technology specific; it is permissive of any technology. It is permissive of any networking s

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer

Industry committee  On both, the answer is yes.

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Philip Palmer