Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Information & Ethics committee Which is what I feel I've done, Mr. Chair.
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee I'm sorry, I want to make sure I'm understanding the question clearly. You're asking me if I would be investigating where the leak came from during that investigation, or...?
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee I believe I have answered that question, Mr. Chair. I will get back to the committee after I look into the matter. I still have full confidence in my staff that it didn't occur from our office, but I will look into it.
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee A couple of weeks. In a week or two I should be able to get back to the committee on that particular point.
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee Mr. Chair, I am finding the questions...I'm not comfortable speculating as to how the source.... The one thing about a newspaper article is that they can write whatever they would like to write, in terms of comments.
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee I'll commence, and if Bruce has something to add, I'll ask him to jump in. One of the things I've actually been doing with my staff, Mr. Chair, is finalizing some guidance and so on that I'll be hoping to publish within the next week or so, which will actually talk about the cou
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee It's not an attempt, with all due respect, Mr. Chair; it's the reasonable apprehension of an apparent conflict of interest. So there doesn't have to be the attempt to influence. If most reasonable people would think that particular action has created a competing private interest
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee Undue influence would have been the action, yes.
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee If I understand correctly, the situation in the Makhija case was exactly the same. The power of the registrar of lobbyists to investigate offences under the act was challenged. The Federal Court, I think it was in December 2008, made a decision holding that the registrar did in f
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee There could perhaps be better coordination between the two, in some regards, but I do not have any further comment on that point.
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee Mr. Chair, that is a very interesting question. I do not have any examples to offer because honestly, to date, I have never refused to consider a case because too much time had elapsed. However, if it has been a long time, it may be difficult to find testimony, people who can pr
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
October 27th, 2009Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee. I am pleased to be here today to provide you with an overview of my accomplishments from the past year and outline my priorities for 2010-2011. I am joined today by René Leblanc, the new Deputy Commissioner, and Bruce Bergen, Se
April 20th, 2010Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd
Information & Ethics committee As I sometimes say, if you were to throw a stone down on the city of Ottawa you would probably hit a public officer holder. But I'll pull out the definition. The designated public office holder is a specific group that the government has identified. It includes ministers, minist
April 20th, 2010Committee meeting
Karen Shepherd