Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 28
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  That's one solution. There is no single solution; there are various ways of doing it. I'm sure we could find other examples. As I've already said, there are still farmers in Plaisance National Park, and there are agreements. I don't believe that has to be black and white. It see

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  There does have to be a manager. I say so in my brief.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  Obviously, because, when I look at certain bridges managed by other authorities, I don't think they contribute much to the improvement of the capital.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  We've examined all those questions, but this is a very complex issue. If we had a lot of employers, it would be easy, but it's hard to say that Health Canada will go to such and such a place and that there has to be a division of employees. Some people don't necessarily want to

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  They're lucky to be living in a national park, which already is a major privilege. The properties have risen in value in recent years, and I'm aware of that. I don't live on the edge of the park. And my children can't live in the municipality because they can't afford to buy a ho

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  As I said earlier, there should be a formalization of the issue and of the agreement between the cities and the two provinces. We've seen, moreover, what's happened with regard to the bridge issue. The two provinces agreed to say that there were three projects to review, not just

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  Could I answer? I'd like to say that you can have a national park. Parks Canada has decided in its criteria not to have private homes, but the national parks of Quebec have them—“national” being the international union's definition of national parks: category two parks. There ar

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  I think it's six members from elsewhere in Canada and six local members. When we made our presentation, at the revision stage, it lacked a little biodiversity, as it were. It was mainly business people. I've got nothing against them, but it would have been interesting for a broad

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  Well, I want it to be called a national park.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  A number of committees are unofficial or ad hoc committees.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  Yes, it's the most recent.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  The NCC is increasingly conducting consultations and establishing committees. However, there is no official harmonization committee, as for all Quebec parks.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  Absolutely.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches

Transport committee  Absolutely. An official committee could involve local authorities, the cities, provinces and the NCC. There is an unofficial tripartite committee that meets twice a year, but I believe it should be official for there to be some consistency among the various planning processes.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Nicole DesRoches