Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-75 of 227
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Information & Ethics committee  The Canadian Privacy Commissioner said that the data should be destroyed presuming that we don't have any legal obligations to otherwise preserve it.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  In my understanding--and if I'm wrong, I'll report back to the committee via letter--all the data was stored in approximately the same place in the United States. So the data that would have been destroyed relevant to Ireland was stored in the United States before it was destroye

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  I don't know specifically who that would be. I'd have to consult internally.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  Well, let me take a step back. First of all, I understand that we have agreed with the report from the Privacy Commissioner's equivalent in the United Kingdom, who has accepted our desire to delete the data in the U.K. I don't know that we've actually deleted the data yet. That's

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  Again, we're doing the analysis just as the Privacy Commissioner envisioned it in her report, which is that U.S. and Canadian law are applicable here--potentially.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  Thank you for asking for that clarification. No, we are not talking about analyzing the data. Google has no interest in trolling through the data, as we've said from the beginning, so thank you for allowing me the opportunity to clarify. I think this is just a poorly worded sent

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  That's correct.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  I won't speculate on the outcome of any particular litigation. I can tell you that it's something we would object to producing in a court proceeding, precisely to protect the privacy of the people whose data were mistakenly collected. There would be an irony to class action lit

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  I wouldn't want to speculate on that. Ultimately, our objective is to delete all the data. We didn't want it in the first place, and we don't want it now, but we don't want to delete it prematurely and cause more headaches.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  We received the Privacy Commissioner's interim letter of finding, which the committee has in its possession, and which she released to the press and to the committee in October. It asked that we delete the data as soon as we had assured ourselves that we are able to do so under C

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  That's my understanding.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  Again, that's my understanding of the facts, yes.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  Thank you for that question. To clarify what I said, when I called the Privacy Commissioner in May to advise her of this unfortunate circumstance, I asked her what she wanted done with the data then. She asked that we preserve the data because perhaps she wanted to launch an inv

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

Information & Ethics committee  No, I didn't say that.

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Jacob Glick