Transport committee  It's because they're matching it to a no-fly list that has problems, that has been--

Transport committee  Your personal information—your name, your gender.

Transport committee  No. I'm saying that the process, the sharing and matching to a no-fly list, would not be allowed elsewhere.

Transport committee  Well, privacy is about this: I can share my information with you, but you're supposed to use it only for the purposes that we have agreed upon. Once you decide to give it to X, Y, Z, that's an infringement of my privacy.

Transport committee  In our view, it's not going to happen that way. We are abiding by an unconstitutional system in the U.S. That's our difficulty. If you are feeling a sense of...you could have time-limited legislation.

Transport committee  What is in front of the district court is the way in which the no-fly list has too many false positives and no due process rights for people. That's the challenge. One of the issues is that there is a potential for Canada to exercise a position of leadership here, I think, becau

Transport committee  We just submitted it today. I'm going to make sure it is sent to you in French.

Transport committee  Yes, that's it.

Transport committee  It'll be a great pleasure for me to write it in French; my French is even better.

Transport committee  Actually, I think one of the issues as well is that.... I don't know the answer to this, but I'll check. My sense is that it's not.

Transport committee  It's a case before a district court in Oregon. Do you want to answer this...? Okay. It concerns the no-fly list, particularly people who have appeared on the no-fly list. One of the problems with this case is that it's the third time the ACLU, the American Civil Liberties Unio

Transport committee  It was in this context that we submitted proposed amendments to restrict the scope of the bill with regard to time, oversight of the bill, to take the pulse, in order to determine somewhat where this is headed. If the U.S. provisions are perhaps ruled unconstitutional, the system

Transport committee  As of now, there's a decision, the Supreme Court v. Ward, that does recognize that when there is a qua breach of constitutional law, it can be indemnified. In our view, I think if we're going to go this route, if a couple of people suffer damages just because we want to support

Transport committee  To provide the right to compensation for the people who will be affected.

Transport committee  I think it's absolutely needed, because that's where the danger lies. You need to keep control over the privacy environment of the country to which you give this information. I think it's incumbent upon parliamentarians to want to keep control over this process.