Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-36 of 36
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Agriculture committee  Yes, it should be a very high percentage when we're talking about food and about cases where you can clearly identify what the ingredient is. So if it's a can of peaches, those peaches should absolutely be grown in Canada. If it's peaches and apples, or whatever might be mixed to

April 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mel Fruitman

Agriculture committee  You're talking about a single-ingredient product? In that case, do you mean the content?

April 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mel Fruitman

Agriculture committee  I think that would possibly be appropriate, yes.

April 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mel Fruitman

Agriculture committee  I'd like to jump in, please. This is why I mentioned in my opening remarks the need to consider what the purpose of this marketing is--when we start confusing the two reasons. One is economic, and one is safety and security concerns, and I think they need to be kept separate.

April 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mel Fruitman

Agriculture committee  Yes, generally we would not have a problem, again, as long as it is quite clear. I understand there have been some other possible terms thrown out for use. No matter what conclusion is come to, those terms have to be clear. They have to be well defined. What they actually mean ha

April 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mel Fruitman

Agriculture committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Consumers' Association of Canada is pleased to have this opportunity to present its views to the committee. For over 60 years the CAC has represented the interests of ordinary Canadians in their role as consumers of goods and services, as provided by b

April 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mel Fruitman