Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 41
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  Those would be the mandatory minimums brought in in 2005, which were the 14-day and 30-day ones. They are shorter mandatory minimums than some other mandatory minimums that currently exist in the Criminal Code.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  Yes, it is possible, but prior to 2005, it would also be possible for probation or a conditional sentence to be a sentence for those offences. After 2005, conditional sentencing would not have been a valid sentence.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  Yes, that's right.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  What I can tell you about those lines and about how they're changing is that if there were mandatory minimums in place in 2005, and there were more cases going into custody, and those mandatory minimums were short, then it's possible that you would see an increase in those shorte

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  The sexual offences against children that we can identify in the courts are identified on page 13, which shows the most serious offences in cases containing at least one guilty verdict. The top line shows the increase in the use of custody for those types of offences. In 2008-200

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  It's for all offences in criminal court. I can provide a more detailed breakdown of that if you would like.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  That's correct.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  I can't confirm the statement by a previous witness. I can talk about the data that I have access to and can analyze, and I can show you the outcomes of criminal court cases that have child victims for those offences that I can identify. That doesn't include sexual assault, becau

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  So you're talking about sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching, and those kinds of offences.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  It's not possible to isolate any information on the victim for sexual assault using simply the information we collect based upon the Criminal Code. Sections 271, 272, and 273 don't have any details on the victim. It's the nature of the offence, not the victim, that is included in

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  For some offences, it may not be possible to break it out for a long period of time. Prior to 2008, a number of these offences were grouped into a much larger category.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  For the criminal court, if you turn to slide 23 in the supplemental section of the presentation, the offences that are included in the other sexual offences are broken down, and those are the charges that are completed in court in the cases that contain at least one of those char

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  This is different from police incidents. This is completed charges in a criminal court.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  Yes. I don't have that information in front of me, but I can provide it to the clerk.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes

Justice committee  Well, it would have been acquitted, stayed, withdrawn, dismissed, discharged, or some other final decision.

February 16th, 2011Committee meeting

Craig Grimes