Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 23
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  A person's religious or political affiliation is not a factor. We take into consideration the person's activity, without taking into account their religion, nationality or political allegiance.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  It is not a question of allegiance. Once again, we are referring to a person's activities.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  That we recommend, sir.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  Three, sir.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  â€”from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, and one from Transport Canada.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  Yes, sir. To be more specific, once again, I would say that the determining factors for us would be this person's actions. And by "actions", I mean that it is only an issue of participation in a group, an organization. It may be a person who has a history of activities that represent a threat to aviation security.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  It could be someone who has committed an offence that represents a threat to aviation security. It is not just an issue of having committed a crime; there has to be a connection between the crime and aviation security.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  Those are the only generic criteria, yes. In fact, we are talking about a person who has proven that they represent a threat to aviation security, or who is considered as such by the committee.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  I am not certain that I could go so far as to provide those kinds of precise details. A person who represents a threat or who has already uttered verbal threats towards an airline or concerning a given flight would be considered as a person who represents a threat.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  It would be a person who has already taken action against someone else and who would have proven they always have the intent and ability to represent a threat.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  Those are the criteria that I have just defined.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  By definition, it is a group that takes violent action in order to further its own ends or to achieve its goals.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  An example of violence would be a terrorist attempt or planting a bomb, for religious or political reasons.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  It is not an issue of organizations but of individuals.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay

Public Safety committee  I am talking about individuals who, through their actions, have proven that they represent a threat.

April 29th, 2010Committee meeting

C/Supt Larry Tremblay