Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Public Safety committee A person's religious or political affiliation is not a factor. We take into consideration the person's activity, without taking into account their religion, nationality or political allegiance.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee It is not a question of allegiance. Once again, we are referring to a person's activities.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee That we recommend, sir.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee Three, sir.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee —from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, and one from Transport Canada.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee Yes, sir. To be more specific, once again, I would say that the determining factors for us would be this person's actions. And by "actions", I mean that it is only an issue of participation in a group, an organization. It may be a person who has a history of activities that represent a threat to aviation security.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee It could be someone who has committed an offence that represents a threat to aviation security. It is not just an issue of having committed a crime; there has to be a connection between the crime and aviation security.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee Those are the only generic criteria, yes. In fact, we are talking about a person who has proven that they represent a threat to aviation security, or who is considered as such by the committee.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee I am not certain that I could go so far as to provide those kinds of precise details. A person who represents a threat or who has already uttered verbal threats towards an airline or concerning a given flight would be considered as a person who represents a threat.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee It would be a person who has already taken action against someone else and who would have proven they always have the intent and ability to represent a threat.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee Those are the criteria that I have just defined.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee By definition, it is a group that takes violent action in order to further its own ends or to achieve its goals.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee An example of violence would be a terrorist attempt or planting a bomb, for religious or political reasons.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee It is not an issue of organizations but of individuals.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay
Public Safety committee I am talking about individuals who, through their actions, have proven that they represent a threat.
April 29th, 2010Committee meeting
C/Supt Larry Tremblay