Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 174
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Information & Ethics committee  Could you be more precise on...?

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  That's right. Yes.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  No, not really, other than there was never any intention to delay or obstruct. So as far as I know...I'm just anxious to see the report of the Information Commissioner.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  Yes. Yes, in many different ways, but yes.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  No. No, it doesn't. But--

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  --just to clarify, though, I didn't know what happened. I didn't know that it took two months, two and a half months, to release this. I didn't know that only part of a document would be released. What I was told by ATI officers was that they could work with the requester to get either exactly what they wanted for the initial $5 fee or they could charge the requester the amount of money it takes--which I think in this case was about $30--for the entire report.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  So I didn't know that.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  I did make a mistake. Yes.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  That's right. Yes.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  I made a mistake. I don't know what happened to the documents. I don't redact. I never redact. I can't--

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  Just to clarify, I thought that.... And again, I was ignorant of the law. I thought that because it was section 11 that had to do with their request, only section 11 should be released. I was wrong in that. And I was ignorant of the law in the sense that I didn't realize.... I had not been confronted with a situation before where it was...you know, if one section is relevant, then the entire section is relevant.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  I'm sorry. Do I respond? Yes? Okay. Can you just repeat it so that I have it clearly?

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri

Information & Ethics committee  I believe it was Isabelle Bouchard.

May 11th, 2010Committee meeting

Sébastien Togneri