Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 316-330 of 387
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Agriculture committee  If the decision is taken at the level of the commission of the European Union, then it would apply across the entire 27 countries.

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  The natural resources issue is obviously an issue of some sensitivity in some cases. The Europeans have access to fewer natural resources than we do. We have a lot of natural resources. We want to sell some of them commercially, and Europe is an attractive market. We want to pres

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  No. Under the agreement within the European Union, member states don't have the option to opt in or out. The European Union will either accept the agreement as a whole--applying to all 27 members--or it will reject it, but there is no middle ground between those.

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  Sure. We've had some 20 years of experience with the NAFTA dispute settlement model, which is very much similar to the WTO dispute settlement model. So we think we're in a good position to try to learn from some mistakes, or some inefficiencies in those models. We are trying

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  Thank you. When we started looking into the issue of procurement at the provincial and municipal levels, the first thing we found out was that there is already a very open system, by and large. Municipalities and provinces often tend to go to where they can get the best deals a

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  Okay, thank you. I'll start with a response to the procurement question, and I'll leave the agriculture questions to my colleague. With respect to procurement, particularly at the provincial and territorial and municipal level, the EU has made it clear across the board that the

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  Yes, we have been spending quite a bit of time on the area of dispute settlement, both with respect to dispute settlement state-to-state as well as the possibility of an investor-state dispute settlement mechanism. We've been having intensive discussions about this. We're tryin

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  Yes, that's correct. There are 22 negotiating tables that we've been running since the beginning of the negotiations. The provinces are involved in those tables that affect areas under their jurisdiction, so they're not in all 22. They are in about, I think, seven or eight. Cert

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  The agriculture issues are discussed at the goods table, and since that primarily deals with issues at the border that's an exclusively federal responsibility, so the provinces are not involved in those tables. But because that's part of the overall picture of the negotiations, w

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  On financial services, the table has been exclusively federal so far, because they've been talking about issues that relate to financial services measures at the federal level--banking and those kinds of issues--and have not got into any kind of detailed discussions of financial

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  If we get into those issues--and whether we will is yet to be determined--we'll have to make that assessment. At this point, in previous agreements we have traditionally carved out the provinces from having any involvement in those areas; we've never negotiated that. The Europea

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  I think it's quite true, and it was said publicly on many occasions, that everything was on the table when we began these negotiations. We have a lot of sensitive issues on both sides, so I think neither side is under the illusion that entirely everything will be on the table at

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

Agriculture committee  Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for inviting us to speak to you today about the Canada-European Union comprehensive economic and trade agreement, known as the CETA. As requested, I will provide an overview of the negotiations. Then Gilles Gauthier, Canada’s chi

December 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

International Trade committee  I don't anticipate it would have much impact on the negotiations themselves, because I think my counterparts in the European Commission would recognize that statements that might be made might not necessarily represent the views of Canada in the negotiations. I may get certain qu

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul

International Trade committee  Well, I think there's a lot of very important work beyond the negotiations themselves. At lot of this, at the end of the day, will be about influencing groups that don't have a direct role in the negotiations, such as the European Parliament, as well as influencing representative

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Steve Verheul