Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Justice committee Thank you very much. You did catch me; you're quite right. Section 3, as it is now, refers to long-term protection of the public, so the amendment simply moves that up but doesn't substantively change that aspect of it.
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee With respect to your second question, in my view, context is determinative. Yes, we can see some of the same or similar language used in some provisions in the Criminal Code that are found in the existing section 38 and in proposals to amend section 38. However, context is king,
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee The musical notes may be the same, but context is king
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee To be honest, I haven't looked at the coordinating amendments in that bill, so off the top of my head I can't answer for certain whether it addresses coordinating amendments here. I don't believe it does, but I haven't specifically looked at that aspect. The other point I would
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee If I could respond very briefly, I have seen previous testimony and your questions and those of your colleagues with respect to the changes to section 3, so I'm familiar with it. As I read the proposed changes to section 3 of the act, they incorporate many of the things that are
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee You may have anticipated my response to the second question. I'm simply a prosecutor, and I'm trying to stay out of the larger political issues involved. However, I would point out that aspects of the YCJA that are reflected in the bill were noted by federal, provincial, and terr
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee The provisions I will speak about are the provisions dealing with the ability to obtain an adult sentence. In the time I have available to recap both our submissions and to provide some explanation for our position in the supplemental submissions, they are as follows. It is cle
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee Mr. Chair, I wonder if we might reverse the order.
March 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee I am.
June 17th, 2010Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee Yes.
June 17th, 2010Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee That is correct.
June 17th, 2010Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee That is correct.
June 17th, 2010Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee That is correct.
June 17th, 2010Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes
Justice committee That's one of the main concerns, yes.
June 17th, 2010Committee meeting
Joshua Hawkes