Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 37
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

November 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Mr. Chair, yes, I agree that the applicant who feels that he or she has been wronged would always have the ability of pursuing a civil action.

November 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

November 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Yes, sir, it is six months. (Amendment agreed to) (Clause 4 as amended agreed to) (On clause 5)

November 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Mr. Chair, I think Ms. Chow has a very valid concern. It may be an indictable offence; it may be a summary conviction. I really can't say. It would depend upon the facts of the case.

November 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It's “mise en accusation” .

November 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I think that's correct. I'm just actually trying to find the amendment here. Mr. Chair, the wording currently is, “that is in the public interest so that they provide professional and ethical representation and advice”. I believe something that followed was removed because it

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Yes. It's just that the idea of preserving the integrity of programs was found to be rather vague compared to “public interest” and “professional and ethical representation and advice”.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It's intended to provide the same sort of guarantee.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Mr. Chair, that was simply removed because it was found by the drafters to be...not necessarily redundant but not adding anything to the provision.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to speak to the matter regarding the situation in Afghanistan, actually, and my concern with regard to the broad term “entity”. This is because the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration created a public policy a while ago to enable Afghan interpret

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I agree with the assessment of Ms. MacNeil. I just wish to say that I don't think the use of that word, even though we're trying to have it apply in the future, would deal with all of the other problems that we see with regard to this proposed amendment. In

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  This is a terribly important issue, and I'm very aware of solicitor-client privilege and who my client is.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  If we could take a little break, that would be very much appreciated.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just wanted to look at the wording. I believe I understand what the Bloc member is attempting to do or hopes to do. I just wanted to look at it again because you have different wording. You have proposed subsection 91(1) that says: Subject to this sect

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Elaine Ménard