Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I am counting six.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Yes, absolutely.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Yes, exactly.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  That's exactly it.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  With the amendments we have recommended, yes. Generally speaking, yes.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  We are counting on the committee to find a way to make these amendments so that the members of our organization consider the bill reasonable.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Yes, that's it.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Are you talking about TPMs?

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Yes.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  We can confirm that for our industry, but we don't really know how the record industry operates.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  The only thing I would add is that while the $5,000 statutory damage award might be sufficient to deter people who are not in the infringement business, it is not going to be a deterrent for those who are. That's what we're primarily concerned about.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Contrary to what is often said about that regime, it does provide a balance and an opportunity for those who receive a notice claiming infringement to dispute that notice on a good faith basis. We think it's important that there be an equitable process, but we also believe that a

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  One of the key questions facing the committee, given what you've heard from witnesses today and what you'll be hearing in the next few months, is whether it makes sense to take the provision out altogether, or, if a decision is made, to find a way to mould the provision in a way

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  We know there has also been much comment about the addition of education to the fair dealing exemption. We share the widely held concern that its ambit is too wide if left undefined and would likely lead to considerable and costly litigation. Placing some definitional parameters

Canadian Heritage committee  We've sought leave from the Supreme Court to appeal on the issue of whether or not Internet service providers, when they're providing broadcasting to their customers, are engaging in broadcasting as defined under the Broadcasting Act. If the court finds that this is the case, the