Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
National Defence committee What is it? It's nine and seven.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee Absolutely, if we're going down that road. Just to finish off, whether or not we need aircraft that carries bombs and missiles and has stealth capabilities, that's a discussion for another day, but if we need to replace the F-18, we'd best do it with what's best available.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee There is no question there has to be a replacement for the F-18. I'm not here really to debate whether or not the F-35 is the right aircraft or the wrong aircraft. There is no question there has to be a replacement, so it's going to be replaced.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee Yes. I'm aware that many of the companies we deal with, and many companies we're not dealing with, have been approached by, or met with, government about industrial offsets.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee Yes, I would love to. Mr. Hawn, let me load the questions the way you did. I love your question--
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee From a straight high-tech point of view, we have MacDonald Dettwiler, which obviously is predominant in space. We have our members at Bombardier Aerospace. We have our AMEs; we have people who sign off aircraft. But off the top of my head, none of our members I can think of are d
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee I would love to respond.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee I can't talk about the numbers, but if it is straight jobs related to the parts, spares, and in-service, that's one thing. Repair and overhaul requires that you buy components to install. I would expect that the components you're buying would generate many times more than that in
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee First, our Canadian industry clearly has the capabilities to do $16 billion worth of work, let alone $12 billion worth of work or $4 billion worth of work. We have the expertise and the technical ability. I'm concerned about guarantees. I have zero confidence, frankly, that Loc
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee Yes. To go back to your question, there's no question about control of the aerospace industry. You play a major role in the aerospace industry if you dabble in technology. You don't develop the aerospace sector by having strong warehousing capabilities. The reality is, if you wan
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee No, I haven't seen the study, but we're coming up with the same numbers. When you have the opportunity to bid on $12 billion, even at a conservative estimate you get 30% to 40%. You're looking at $4 billion worth of offsets, or in that area. Once again, and I don't want to be rep
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee Yes, that would be a fair statement.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee Let's be candid. Lockheed Martin is going to control the high technology in the manufacturing of the aircraft. The key fuselage, the Q-bay, and the key technologies are going to be maintained by Lockheed Martin. So what's left over? Machining, composite work, assembly. For exam
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee The aerospace industry is heavily subsidized, including Canadian aerospace giants. So it's a question of how much you want to participate. If you take a look at Canada's auto industry, it has declined over the years. Why? Because other countries around the world have been more
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias
National Defence committee That is correct.
November 25th, 2010Committee meeting
Jerome Dias