Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Canadian Heritage committee The scope of the exemption is more—
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Indeed it was. In this case, it applies more specifically to audiovisual rather than to culture industries as a whole.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee I have already explained that, as far as we understand the discussions between the negotiating teams, the Europeans want to understand our definition of the provision and how it applies to the agreement as a whole. This is what the minister explained last week. It is basically an
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee As I said earlier, we are in conversation with the negotiators. They share information with us that is generally confidential. We endeavour to keep that information confidential.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Our appearance before this committee today is one opportunity. We also widely promote our positions that are already known to the negotiators and to Quebec. Our members also talk about these issues. Everyone is in favour of co-operation, but there needs to be agreement on the for
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee It is—
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee As I explained earlier, the danger is that an exemption agreement be followed immediately by discussions on a protocol. This might tempt those whose business initiatives have been stymied by the exemption to interfere in the debate on cultural co-operation. There could be attempt
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Yes, clearly.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Well, what I've understood is that the minister made it clear that foreign ownership or investment from Europe would not...you know, the policy remains, so that's one area. But when I was alluding to whether we should revise the exemption clause to consider new forms and new ways
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Well, we've touched the surface of how far we should go into this, but obviously these are industries. It's like book publishing and sound recording. It's sort of a long list of industries. In fact, what you want to secure is a capacity to create content and to have policies and
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Yes, I believe so.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Well, we first have to secure the exemption itself, as it stands, before we are moving forward on any new proposals or any reconfiguration of the clause itself. Let's win the day on that first, and let's secure the grounds that we have secured thus far. In terms of the audiovis
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee If there is a revision of sorts, that's where I would see it coming from, rather than saying that telco has to be brought into the fold and defined as culture-creating content.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee Indeed.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand
Canadian Heritage committee You are asking me to answer for the Europeans.
February 7th, 2011Committee meeting
Charles Vallerand