Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Not necessarily...?

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Well, it depends on the specifics—

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  —but certainly it would be authors and publishers who conceivably would be the plaintiffs. If the collective is involved in that particular infringement, then of course they would be party to this as well. I don't think it's realistic to think that any infringement that occurs wo

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Certainly we would welcome a narrowing of the definition. As to the specifics of the applicability of the three-step test in this context, I'm going to ask Grace Westcott to answer for us.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Not at all; I think--I'll answer in English, if you'll bear with me--that if--

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Okay. I think a law that leads automatically to litigation to resolve uncertainty is an outcome that no one wants to see. Our members don't want to have this resolved in court.... Did I misunderstand?

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Thank you for this opportunity to speak today on behalf of the ACP. It represents 127 independent publishers from across the country. We have members in all provinces. They publish books in all genres: literary books, cookbooks, children's books, general interest books, scholarly