Industry committee  I have one comment. Motion isn't always progress. Just because things are being done, it doesn't mean that they're the right things. As a country, I think we have to figure out what's right for our country to do overall. We have to balance a whole bunch of rights and work within

Industry committee  You don't want to open that debate now. There's not enough time left. We actually just participated in a Competition Bureau market study and discussed all of the severe anti-competitive problems that exist in Canada for the smaller ISP sector. I don't want to take us off track,

Industry committee  I don't know about that. I think it's related to competition, generally. I don't want to stray into other areas that I know less about and are not my domain. All I can say is this: If there's any kind of rebalancing that needs to take place in the digital era between streamers a

Industry committee  The ones that are the biggest and have the most resources and are championing the FairPlay coalition are Bell, Rogers, Shaw, Vidéotron and so on.

Industry committee  That's right, either directly or through affiliates.

Industry committee  It depends more on how big their scale is and what sort of technology measure is being required of them. For example, you order an ISP to use deep packet inspection, which is a form of inspecting the headers on packets of traffic that tells you a lot about the type of traffic b

Industry committee  Wherever they are.

Industry committee  Sure.

Industry committee  That's right.

Industry committee  Somebody should pay other than the person, the innocent party, who's being required to do the job.

Industry committee  Potentially, yes, because the packet inspection, and making decisions on blocking based on that, doesn't provide you with any information about the context in which those packets are being transmitted. You're quite right that some of them may be authorized and some of them may no

Industry committee  If in the carriage of content, the issue has come up.... By the way, there are already provisions now that, again, don't allow ISPs and other Internet service ecosystem participants to take advantage of safe harbour if there's a court order that says something is infringing and

Industry committee  Mr. Copeland is well placed to answer that because he deals with this in our firm.

Industry committee  I don't think so. That's the concern. Without court supervision there is a serious risk of eroding democratic values of free speech and expression, and freedom of expression. The reason we have court safeguards is that the courts are the ultimate protectors of our Constitution a

Industry committee  We could provide some redacted materials.