Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I was just going to add that the revenue stream is not large for us, but it's a very important thing. I think these two companies in question do a tremendous job in sales and marketing of Canadian film, Quebec film, and also films other than American films, frankly, from around

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  As I said earlier, it's not for financial reasons, I would say, in this case. Obviously any loss is not a good loss. We're Canadian distributors. It's important for us that the local Canadian film industry survive and flourish. If future generations are not educated about our fil

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I believe so, yes.

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  There are a couple of points there. One, of course, is that if we can reverse this trend, it will provide more revenue streams back to companies such as Entertainment One and Alliance, and because we're Canadian-based, we tend to reinvest that revenue back into Canada. Of cours

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  You brought up a very good point because, of course, the Ipsos study is looking behind and not looking forward. You used the word “epidemic”. This is what's happening. We are in a digital world and we're going faster and faster into a digital world. That is how people have chosen

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I think I'll just focus, then, on the key parts of what I was going to talk about, which is reiterating somewhat what Patrick has said already. This year we've distributed films like Barney's Version and Incendies, which are two of the most acclaimed films of this year, and if we