Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 586
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  I'm just going to refer to the Department of Finance's estimates themselves on page 51 of the supplementary estimates (B) document. What you should see in there is the list of the voted items first, and then you'll see the statutory bit, and on the federal-provincial payments t

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Mr. Chair, to be clear, the severance is not a buyback. This was a payout of severance that employees had earned during their tenure with the government as part of their collective agreements. It just was a matter of giving employees the option of receiving those funds now or lat

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  I take your point that it is difficult to follow. The reason is that with the central vote allocations, the Treasury Board actually has the authority to transfer those moneys out to departments. But I appreciate the point that it's not clear, and we have noted it.

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  To explain that, it is important to understand that the supplementary estimates are not an estimate of— Don't rely on the supplementary estimates to judge whether departments forecasted properly. This is solely a case of when departments actually received Treasury Board authorit

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  There are two pieces to AECL, as I mentioned. The first piece relates to the ongoing operations of AECL. That's the voted bit. The second piece relates to the divestiture. You're right, the sale has been concluded. That agreement actually included an acknowledgement by that new

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  It's correct that it's cash, but the more important point is that it's an annual appropriation. With few exceptions, where we have a few agencies that get multi-year funding, it's an annual appropriation. It expires at March 31 if you have not spent it, and that's why we have to

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  I would say yes. Again, it depends on the model that you're using, but if you actually look at an annual system, if it's not incurred in the year, you would have to come back for Parliament's authority yet again. So it's not a matter of cash versus accrual; it's a matter of it be

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  I can't speak for all, but I will say that provincially you have a mix. Municipalities typically operate more on a cash basis than the more senior governments. In the federal government you have a mix of accrual and cash. The estimates are cash; the budget is accrual. Municipalit

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Mr. Chair, the advantage for CRA is that they can offset student loans against tax refunds. So you have an integrated collector there, because CRA--

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Merci. I just wanted to find the actual amount given in the supplementary estimates to Public Works, and there is funding for the renovation of the parliamentary buildings. There's nothing in here about recovery of costs. The way cost recovery works, as the secretary indicated,

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  While the secretary is looking for that, what you'll find in the public accounts is the actual display of the authorities that were available for use, as well as the actual spending. You will not actually see an explanation as to why. Typically, with a program like that, you're w

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  If I understand correctly, this is in Mr. Page's report. He has provided an analysis of the estimates to date, which is for the main estimates plus supplementary estimates (A) and supplementary estimates (B). The amount that's actually driving that is the Treasury Board central

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  The agreement was not for all of AECL. It was for part of AECL.

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  That part of the organization actually had some refurbishment or life extension types of projects--I believe the Bruce Power plant is one, and there's one in Korea--which are known to be incurring costs greater than the revenue. That was the part of the deal where the government

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Vote 5, government contingencies, is basically for unforeseen circumstances that a department or organization cannot fund itself and cannot wait for the next estimate cycle.

November 24th, 2011Committee meeting

Bill Matthews