Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 586
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  From my perspective, Chair, changing the fiscal year does absolutely no good whatsoever, and it may actually cause other people some stress. But the issue here is the link between the budget and the estimates, and in my opinion that is not impacted by the fiscal year. So that's t

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  I think the comments made were around the process for notifying employees, which is governed by our collective agreements with employees. The process that was articulated in the budget was that there would be discussion, with the unions notified first, then employees, and then yo

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  I think the other comment made was around the link between RPPs—reports on plans and priorities—and main estimates. RPPs by convention support the main estimates, and as this committee knows, the main estimates do not reflect decisions from the budget. That's also the other con

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  I'm not sure on the rule front. The other thing I would point out, though, is that since the 2005 budget, the additional reporting is now done by departments. The biggest addition is around the quarterly financial reports, which didn't exist back then. My own suggestion is that

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  If you're speaking about it from an estimates perspective—

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  —there's no need to include statutory information in the estimates documentation. The reason for doing so is that statutory spending is roughly two-thirds of the government's total spending, give or take, in a given year. Some people like to see that perspective. The other pers

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  It depends, Chair, upon the nature of the items. If you have a new program in a budget, because of budget secrecy and other things, you may not see work started on a new program design in earnest until the budget is actually tabled. We do have examples of cases where it's two and

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Part of it is that some of the other countries have cash in both documents. And not every country has a Treasury Board, which actually requires a rather detailed expenditure plan before you can actually go through the estimates. You have to understand the control that Parliamen

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  We have, Chair, data by program. Departments certainly plan by program. I'm thinking more along the lines of how you actually control spending, and I'm talking here about financial systems and controls. The current controls are built around capital, operating, and Gs and Cs. So

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Well, if you think about the process we go through in preparing the mains, it's a long process. I acknowledge that. So I'm conservative because I'd be the one stuck with the responsibility for implementing this, but three to five years is not unreasonable, no.

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  You need to understand that the information is largely out there now, but it's provided for information purposes. So we would actually be asking departments to change their control structures and their financial systems to effectively respect the new set of rules. That's not some

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  They may have the political oversight, but from a controls perspective, blowing your vote is a significant event and it's not one anyone takes lightly. So you do want to make sure the control structure is actually built into departments to respect whatever it is that Parliament i

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  Thanks. That's an interesting question. The quasi-stats present a challenge and we can probably do a better job of describing programs. Because from a parliamentarian's perspective, there's statutory, which means no vote necessary, and there's voted. A quasi-stat is a voted whe

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  The reporting burden that I mentioned was.... There are significant amounts of documentation in the RPPs and DPRs, as well as online, that support those documents. If members are not finding them useful in terms of helping out—

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews

Government Operations committee  That's the biggest one I would point to. The quarterly financials are a relatively new invention as well, but they seem to be getting some attention. People seem to be using them. I'm going to turn to Sally and see if there's anything that jumps out at her.

May 14th, 2012Committee meeting

Bill Matthews