Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee The amendments in July 2010 dealt with a number of aspects principally related to the comprehensive study process. The amendments removed the step in the process where the minister decided on the track, whether it would be a comprehensive study or a review panel. That step was el
October 27th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee There are maybe a couple we can speak to. Australia has a somewhat similar regime. Most countries have environmental assessment legislation. In Australia's case, they have the same kind of dynamics we have here in Canada. They have the federal level of government and, in their
October 27th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee Mr. Chair, we provided earlier this week summaries of a number of assessments that had been completed dating back to the passage of the act in 1995, and attached to that was a summary table. We noticed that due to some discrepancies in the way in which we were reporting the infor
October 27th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee There are also situations where National Defence may be proposing a project. The other triggers involve the provision of land or a regulatory decision.
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee For land triggers, National Defence could be one of the large landholders. In fact, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development administers lands on reserve. When there are projects on reserve, they are required to authorize them. Those would be two examples.
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee A good example I would cite deals with two of the commercial crowns—the Business Development Bank of Canada and the Farm Credit Corporation.They provide commercial funding to proponents to carry out projects, so they are required to do assessments every time they provide funding
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee That's correct.
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee There are expansions of parking lots, small expansions to buildings, etc. The exclusion list regulation identifies categories of projects and then puts thresholds on those. If they're below the threshold, they would be excluded. A building greater than 500 square metres would req
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee I think I can answer that, Elaine. In the quality assurance study that was done, which Ms. Feldman referred to, we also looked at the overall timeframe of those screenings. The median duration over the three years, I think, was about 50 days. Now whether that included people wo
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Environment committee Per project.
October 20th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Natural Resources committee I agree.
October 5th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Natural Resources committee It's typically 12 months to 14 months.
October 5th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Natural Resources committee No, we're in the same ballpark.
October 5th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Natural Resources committee The act has a requirement for a pause of 30 days once there's a notice of commencement. We have an Internet site registry where all projects are identified and which the public can access. There's a 30-day period between a notice of commencement and a decision. The shortest timef
October 5th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley
Natural Resources committee At least.
October 5th, 2011Committee meeting
John McCauley