Environment committee  I'd start by saying that we had a long and storied history of consultation in relation to our projects in northern Saskatchewan, before the duty to consult became the focus of case law in that regard. Cameco Corporation is the largest industrial employer of first nations and ab

Environment committee  Absolutely, and—

Environment committee  Hi. It's Liam Mooney again. In that regard, I think the answer that we've been pushing for is more that equivalency compensation, the recognition of the jurisdiction and the capability of the province to do environmental assessment. We would not advocate for a list approach. I t

Environment committee  We believe that if equivalency is adopted, there are efficiencies, in that you have the provincial assessment process that's carried out for the project, and the checks and balances that would be in place federally do constitute a review of that process and provide a degree of co

Environment committee  In our first recommendation, we talked about rationalization of the project triggers. And I think in that conversation there was some clarity: It should be the bigger asks, the bigger questions, that precipitate a federal environmental assessment requirement. Whether it's ultimat

Environment committee  Thanks, Pam. It's Liam Mooney, with Cameco Corporation. On that subject, I think the Province of Saskatchewan is ultimately going to have a story in relation to this. But I would go back to the example that Pam Schwann delivered earlier on the Olympic Dam project, a major expan

Environment committee  On that question, the point that is being made in the SMA submission is actually what you're driving at: to recognize that we are a significant part of the employment picture in northern Saskatchewan and that projects that take much longer to come into place might not be as attra