Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 34
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Very much so. These were proposals I was involved with. We need safeguards. There are existing safeguards in the system that date from 1997, which say that when there is a donation of essentially private company shares and the donor is not at arm's length from the charity, there

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I do, and we may need additional safeguards of added valuation because there would be more of these donations if we eliminated capital gains.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  Just to make the distinction between non-profit versus registered charities, you're talking about registered charities, are you?

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  With non-profits we probably lack clarity. With registered charities there's a high level of clarity and a high level of public disclosure.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  It is published. It's on the CRA website. CRA is actually increasing and listing it, so it's on a little score chart that will be released later this year.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I think in most cases the system captures direct corporate transfers, as opposed to community fundraising that goes out in the name of the corporation.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I don't believe so. It would be captured in the individual tax numbers if those taxpayers were reporting their donations.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I absolutely agree that getting the balance right.... There is a danger of overemphasizing the tax benefits. I think our system, for the most part, is appropriate. The question is, how much do we enrich it and at what cost to the government? Will it actually turn into greater ben

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I think in a number of crucial measures we have a more generous regime, contribution limits being one. Their contribution limits are a maximum of gifts equal to up to 20% of their annual income, and up to 50%, depending on which charity it goes to. We have up to 100%. So that's s

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I think many parts of the sector struggle with severe resource constraints. But the philanthropic spirit is actually very large and strong in Canada. We're one of the leaders in the world in that as well. We compare ourselves to big brother America, but they set a very high stand

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I think that has changed significantly over the last 15 to 20 years. Professional fundraising groups that appear before this committee did not exist 20 years ago, for example. There's a whole culture and professionalism to ensure that support is there for the charitable sector.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  No. According to the long-term trend for Canadian giving over a 15-year period, giving has actually gone up by 120% from 1995 to 2010.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  It's individual giving. Individual giving is four times corporate giving in the system. So we focus on corporations, but the individuals are the lifeblood of the charitable sector in donations.

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

Finance committee  I have worked extensively with private foundations. First, the 3.5% is a minimum. Many spend much more. The endowment system is for long-term benefit. To give you an example, we had a foundation that was set up in 1950 with $13 million. It's now $110 million. It has given out o

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows

February 9th, 2012Committee meeting

Malcolm Burrows