Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-26 of 26
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Agriculture committee  Yes, absolutely, the more we can do on harmonization with the U.S. and reducing those transactional costs.... Our prices are hinged directly to U.S. prices. Every time you add a transaction cost or a different cost, it costs the Canadian cattle and pork industries, but in this ca

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  I've got a person who sort of concentrates on doing that. We could produce some information on the differences in standards.

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  Yes, absolutely. In fact, I was one of the people who helped create the Canada Beef Export Federation in 1989, to diversify. It's been a constant effort. That said, market forces still make the U.S. important, but these other markets are where you can add tremendous value as well

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  Yes, long term.

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  Yes, we do. We see growth in beef demand, and we believe if we are able to address competitiveness issues, we will remain one of the largest exporters of beef in the world. But it will be built around our ability to produce and sell beef, not just in Canada but around the world.

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  Competitiveness is never simply one or the other. It's a whole range of things you have to do. We have to create an environment where we attract the right investment as well. I take a look at what we are doing in terms of research and having access to new technologies, and we'r

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  We have certainly increased capacity, so from that point of view they were successful. Early on, back to 2006, we raised concerns about the competitive burden on Canadian packers, whether it was the enhanced feed ban or other issues that would put them at a competitive disadvan

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  It gets down to a market power question. We analyzed this a number of years ago. It changes if we have access to a large number of U.S. plants bidding, because then the market power is quite different from when they don't. Captive supply is one of those things where there are g

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  Federal-provincial meetings are an interesting process. You appear and then you leave, and then they discuss after you've left, so we get feedback from a number of sources. I can tell you where we've had support. I believe we've had good, strong support on moving forward from gov

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  As far as Ontario goes, I'm not sure yet of the impact of that. It's not just bringing in foreign workers. We've been able to bring in very good, skilled foreign workers from these countries. Meat plants aren't the easiest places to attract people to. We often sort of joke that w

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft

Agriculture committee  Clearly, put the energy and resources into the trade secretariat, which the government has announced is moving forward. When you look at the ability of countries to negotiate, Australia and New Zealand have done some extraordinary things. I don't know how many of you are aware, b

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Dennis Laycraft