Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-23 of 23
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  No, actually, in this case it's an exception in law. The authorities come from a crown prerogative and they are codified in the Canadian passport order. It's important to mention that there are sections in the Canadian passport order that say that these ministers may exercise cro

May 26th, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  We can confirm that it is still possible. The section protects persons, so employees of the government, but not the crown. There could still be proceedings against the crown.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  Actually, I think the act was developed in the study of the Privacy Act, and both work together. Clause 5 already explicitly states that, “Subject to any provision of any other Act of Parliament, or of any regulation made under such an Act, that prohibits or restricts the disclos

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  It doesn't restrict anything. That is the effect of the “For greater certainty...”. What we're really trying to do through this provision is to express that existing rules and existing law pertaining to use and further sharing of information continue to apply as they are. Therefo

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  When a provision begins with “for greater certainty”, it announces that the intention is not to modify anything in law or indicates that the act does not affect or does not.... It essentially states what is already the case. Usually these clauses are included for transparency and

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  When the definition was crafted, all existing definitions in law were studied and taken into account. It was considered that we should not constrain the definition to legal interpretations that are associated with other statutes because they were brought into force in very specif

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  Actually the definition of “activity that undermines the security of Canada” took into account the concepts of national security relevant to the 17 recipients, so we made sure that the elements of the CSIS definition were included in clause 2 so they could receive information und

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher

Public Safety committee  I think it's very important to continue to consider the examples and the definition in light of the chapeau. The test in the definition is actually included in the chapeau, so therefore “an activity that undermines the security of Canada” is an activity that undermines the sovere

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

Sophie Beecher