Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 196-210 of 279
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  That's correct.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  We haven't actually received the subamendment.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  The immediate reaction, based on legal advice as well, is that government institutions don't sign agreements with themselves. They can't bind themselves.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  To the second part on the threshold related to critical infrastructure, I just go back to the point that we've made before that the chapeau is the key here, that the threshold be considered in the context of whether the activity undermined the sovereignty of Canada, the security

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  I'll let Sophie take a crack at it.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  That's right, because the other 16 would be affected. You cannot disclose lawfully to the other 16 without the proposed definition. The CSIS Act definition in section 2 of that act doesn't necessarily include all the other 16.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  The answer is no. The purpose of the bill is not just about CSIS. It's much broader than that. I believe there's a schedule attached to the bill. There are 17 departments and agencies that are involved in national security in one way or the other. I think the amendment would nar

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  That is not the case. This does not change the mandate of the service or the powers of the service in any way. All we wanted to do was to make sure that the definition allowed for the mandates of other departments and agencies involved in national security to lawfully receive inf

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  No. Again, the 17 are the receivers. They are the national security departments and agencies that are somehow related. The act is about sharing of all of the Government of Canada with those national security agencies. There's no change in collection authorities by anyone in the

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  It's one of the 17, but what they can collect does not change. This is making sure that all of the 17 have the authority to collect information, and that information can be disclosed to them. We're not changing the powers of the service at all.

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  It's because the 17 that are in the schedule of the act need all of their mandates to be encompassed by the act, otherwise the act won't have an effect. It will only have an effect for CSIS if we use the CSIS mandate defined in the CSIS Act in section 2. We needed to make sure th

March 31st, 2015Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  I'm referring to the CT, counterterrorism, strategy. We tend to not define terrorism directly. We talk about the terrorist activities that you see described in the Criminal Code. That's an act or omission undertaken inside or outside Canada for a political, religious, or ideologi

May 9th, 2013Committee meeting

John Davies

May 9th, 2013Committee meeting

John Davies

Public Safety committee  I think there's an element of subjectivity in how you look at this.

May 9th, 2013Committee meeting

John Davies