Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-8 of 8
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  I'd be happy to, Chair. The policy intent here is to have the commission not undermine its work in the complaints area, so just to assure.... It's an attestation that sufficient resources are there to conduct a review that won't take away from the complaint and that other review

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  The commissioner has to explain that to the chair.

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  There is a duty to suspend if it's going to actively interfere with a criminal investigation.

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  I might add that in our discussions with the CPC, the current commission, they were open to maybe scoping out the complaint and putting part of it in abeyance, on hold, and continuing to pursue this element of the complaint.

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  Yes. We'll be moving with regulations that will prescribe those kinds of complaints that couldn't be resolved informally.

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  Exactly. As we do those regulations, we'll be consulting, and there will be the ability to comment, etc.

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  You would have to show how that complaint investigation is interfering with the criminal investigation.

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais

Public Safety committee  Perhaps I can answer that. It goes back to the earlier question. The duty to suspend is under subsections 45.74(1) and 45.74(2). There is a provision there that if the chair of the Public Complaints Commission finds that their review of a complaint could seriously hinder a crimin

October 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Anita Dagenais