Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 32
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Correct.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  It currently requires disclosure of legal activity. I think that should be excluded.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  Again, I think labour trusts should be exempted from the bill.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  I don't have a response. I really don't understand how that amendment would work.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  Well, I think I addressed that before. It would in respect...but it would still cause concerns for the privacy question.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  You never ask a lawyer to go into detail and then say they have a short time.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  The problem from the constitutional point of view is that it requires such extensive reporting of payor/payee reasons for the transaction with respect to political activities, lobbying activities, and organizing activities, as well as collective bargaining activities, that this c

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  From the CBA's perspective, the bill is obviously an amendment to the Income Tax Act. It would have to be supported on that basis. It wasn't clear to us on the face of this bill what income tax-related purpose the bill was attempting to achieve. It seems to have potentially maybe

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  Right now the bill, in its current form, would require those to be published and made public on a website. Clearly that's, from our perspective, a concern. It's not clear to me what the proposed amendments are, but if the amendment is simply that the name and the salary still be

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  There isn't, not on the face of the bill as it is currently drafted.

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  Our submissions reflect three of our sections: the privacy law section, the pension and benefits law section, and the constitutional law section. The constitutional law section raises serious reservations regarding the bill's constitutionality. Again, that's one of the reasons th

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  With respect to the issues of privacy, I think there's clearly an issue on the side of pension, health, and welfare plans that needs to be addressed. Requiring somebody's pension benefits or prescription drug benefits to be posted on a public website would run afoul of Canadian p

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  When it comes to those issues, I think we're getting confused between items that are under provincial jurisdiction and those that are under federal jurisdiction. What we heard from Mr. Kelly is a concern that's addressed in provincial legislation. Provinces, as we know, will have

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca

Finance committee  If I may, one of our biggest concerns with the bill, and we have a few, is with respect to its extremely broad definition of labour trusts. We've already heard several times this afternoon that it includes a number of entities, which may or may not have been the intention of this

October 25th, 2012Committee meeting

Michael Mazzuca