Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-38 of 38
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Barb, I think you were speaking.

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  There's one thing I wanted to raise from what I've heard. There's this assumption that this legislation actually leads to greater protection against criminality, but that assumption is based on the fact that somebody is reported, detected, tried, sentenced, and convicted. Many vi

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  First of all, I stand behind what I said originally, that clause 24 should be dropped. I don't want to take a contrary position, but I would say in the alternative I think one of the things that could be done is to remove this foreign conviction or the foreign crime where there's

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It's even worse than that, because you can be barred for misrepresentation even if you didn't know what you were saying was false. For instance, you could father a child and not disclose the child, and you might not even know you have a child, because you haven't been in touch wi

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  As I mentioned, for people who come here before 18 and who've been here at least 10 years before the crime, those cases all go to headquarters now if there is no appeal. You're not going to be saving any time by cutting those people out of appeals. Headquarters processing takes a

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Well, like Barbara and Robin, I've been around this system for a long time and I've seen a lot of changes. My experience is that the changes never quite work out exactly the way that Parliament intended. There is a lot of litigation where you get individual hardship cases. The sy

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  As you can see from my notes, I want to talk only about one provision of the bill, clause 24. The first point I would make is that the change proposed in clause 24 is anomalous in that it treats a foreign act where there is no conviction more seriously than a conviction in Canad

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Good afternoon, and thank you for having me back when I've already appeared before.

November 5th, 2012Committee meeting

David Matas