Canadian Heritage committee  Yes, it was amended.

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes, Madam Chair. We are on CPC-14.15.

Canadian Heritage committee  It is, Madam Chair.

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. Mr. Champoux, you are indeed right. These amendments are related without really being related, in the sense that they are not the same. It is up to the committee to choose the one that suits it best.

Canadian Heritage committee  The lines of the bill are not in conflict, but you have to make a choice as to the wording that would follow.

Canadian Heritage committee  Would Mr. Housefather read the amendment again, so we can make sure we have it?

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, I just need clarification from Mr. Julian, if I may. Mr. Julian, I just want to make sure that the amendment you just moved is the one we sent earlier by email.

Canadian Heritage committee  Does the one we sent by email replace NDP-4 and NDP-5?

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you.

Canadian Heritage committee  I have a question regarding Mr. Bittle's amendment. Just to make sure I understand how it reads. Is it “on matters, including through the community element and of public concern”, and then the rest of it?

Canadian Heritage committee  There is no “through the community element” anywhere.

Canadian Heritage committee  Sorry, I was looking at the first “matters”. There is one on the third line.

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes, that is exactly why. NDP-3 changes lines 18 to 34, and BQ-6 changes lines 28 to 34. The amendments therefore affect the same lines.

Canadian Heritage committee  The fact is that NDP-3 replaces proposed paragraphs (f) and (f.1). It replaces both.

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes.