Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 451-465 of 537
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  Being a proceduralist, I won't be able to tell you that, but maybe the experts across the way can.

May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Environment committee  It's on page 33.

May 10th, 2018Committee meeting

The Clerk

Environment committee  The experts are in the booth, but I will try. The words “Au moins un membre nommé” are replaced with the words “Au plus un membre nommé” to denote the maximum.

May 10th, 2018Committee meeting

The Clerk

Environment committee  Right now, paragraph 3, line 15, reads as follows: “Au moins un membre nommé au titre du paragraphe”. After the amendment, it will read as follows: “Au plus un membre nommé au titre du paragraphe”.

May 10th, 2018Committee meeting

The Clerk

Environment committee  Would you happen to have a written copy of the amendment?

May 10th, 2018Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Public Safety committee  It would read that Bill C-59, in clause 103, be amended by replacing paragraph 1.1(f) with the following: (f) interfering with the movement of any person, excluding the detention of an individual; and

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  Do you want me to read the new amendment twice amended?

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  Okay. In English, proposed subparagraph 20.2(1) reads: The Service shall, within three months after the end of each calendar year, submit to the Minister a report of the activities of the Service during the preceding calendar year, and the Minister shall cause the report to

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  I can try. The amendment as it reads right now, says, basically “That Bill C-59, in clause 76, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 10”, but we don't want to do that anymore. What you want to do is add, so it should read, “by adding, after line 11 on page 71, the following”, and th

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  That's what you want to do. If I may answer Mr. Dubé's question at the same time...?

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  You would be right.

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  You are right to say that the French versions are identical, but sometimes the English version, unlike the French version, requires more clarifications in terms of deciding whether to use “and” or “or”. Sometimes, the French version is clear de facto. In this case, the “et” inclu

April 17th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Public Safety committee  I cannot discuss the translation, as I am not a translator, but specialized translators would be able to do so. I assume that the translators who worked on the amendments had the amendments of the Conservative Party, the NDP and possibly the Liberal Party at the same time. At th

April 17th, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Foreign Affairs committee  Ms. Vandenbeld's amendment replaces lines 11 to 22.

March 1st, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Foreign Affairs committee  Yes, lines 11 to 22 on page 4. Your amendment replaces lines 13 to 14, so the lines you're trying to amend have, in fact, disappeared. They can no longer be amended. It's possible to amend a single line only once. That's why it's not possible to amend—

March 1st, 2018Committee meeting

Philippe Méla