Foreign Affairs committee  I will defer to you, Mr. Chair.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yes, Mr. Genuis, you are quite right. If the decision is overturned today, once the bill goes back to the House at report stage, any member could raise a point of order in the House to challenge the fact that one or some amendments were ruled inadmissible.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ms. McPherson, that would not be considered a subamendment because you are replacing the amendment of the government by your own. The course of action would be to defeat the government amendment first and then propose your amendment after that.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm not sure what the question is. Is it if G-1 is admissible? Is that the question?

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. To Ms. McPherson, I had a question for you regarding your subamendment. Your subamendment should amend G-1 in one way or another. It seems that your subamendment is actually amending the text of the bill, but not G-1. That was the point that Mr. Oliphant wa

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm just going to read from the start: “(3) If more than two years have elapsed after the publication of a statement respecting the development of subsequent proposed regulations or instruments under subsection (1) or (2) without the minister having publish

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. You need to be at page 15 of the bill, line 25 to start with. It would be that the amendment be amended by, first, adding on line 25, page 15, after the words “a plan”, the words “including timelines”. That would be the first change. The second change wou

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, I'm sorry. This is the legislative clerk speaking. I just wanted to point out that since CPC-23 was defeated, the ruling does not need to be addressed.

Human Resources committee  Good afternoon. My name is Philippe Méla. I'm also a legislative clerk. Émilie will do a fine job answering your questions.

Canadian Heritage committee  If I could add something, Madam Chair, it could also be a drafting convention. Maybe the French is not much better than the English in this case. It may be just a drafting convention.

Canadian Heritage committee  You could add an “or”.

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, you have my apologies for that. I sent you an email earlier, before the committee started. Mr. Housefather's amendment is not in your notes, but it's coming exactly at this point in time.

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm going to refer to the French version for a second, if you don't mind. In the introductory part of clause 27, it reads: 27 (1) At the request of a news business, the Commission must, by order, designate the business as eligible if it: [...] You then

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. To the question of Mr. Julian, I note that the amendment says, “(1.1) The code of ethics referred to in subparagraph (1)(b)(iv)”. As it stands right now, there is no code of ethics referred to in this part of the bill. The only place it is referred to is

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. Can I just have a minute to look at it, please?