Justice committee  Yes.

Fisheries committee  Just to make sure I understand what the French would look like, it would be: “d'un réseau national d'aires marines protégées”?

Fisheries committee  I have a question for Mr. Doherty, if I may. Since you want to change “protected areas” to “marine protected areas”, there's a heading just above that in the bill that says “Network of Protected Areas”, would you like to change that as well at the same time? It would be “Network

Fisheries committee  Then in French, again if I may, it would be “réseau national d'aires marines protégées”.

Fisheries committee  Thank you.

Fisheries committee  Is that for Mr. Doherty?

Fisheries committee  My understanding is the two amendments are working together since, in CPC-2, you are defining what “eligible” means—

Fisheries committee  —and then in CPC-5 you indicated “(a) shall list the classes of activities that are eligible”.

Fisheries committee  Our understanding was they work together because you're using the term that's defined. In essence, since the definition was negatived, CPC-5 would follow the definition because they go together. Unless you see differently, and you don't agree with me and say that “eligible” doesn

Fisheries committee  Correct.

Fisheries committee  I can try. My understanding of the difference between Ms. May's and Mr. Donnelly's amendments is that Ms. May is proposing to have a regulation that prohibits a number of activities and Mr. Donnelly would like to entrench that in the act. So at the end of the day the result is t

Foreign Affairs committee  Ms. Vandenbeld's amendment replaces lines 11 to 22.

Foreign Affairs committee  Yes, lines 11 to 22 on page 4. Your amendment replaces lines 13 to 14, so the lines you're trying to amend have, in fact, disappeared. They can no longer be amended. It's possible to amend a single line only once. That's why it's not possible to amend—

Foreign Affairs committee  I'm referring to your first amendment.

Public Safety committee  You are right to say that the French versions are identical, but sometimes the English version, unlike the French version, requires more clarifications in terms of deciding whether to use “and” or “or”. Sometimes, the French version is clear de facto. In this case, the “et” inclu