Justice committee  I think it was basically an accounting issue. What we were doing as of that year is the central votes that we get during the year for collective agreement funding, for people on disability, etc., were all included under the internal services banner, when they were not previously.

Justice committee  It was an adjustment in terms of how we did the accounting to make sure that what should have been aligned to internal services was properly aligned to internal services and has continued ever since.

Justice committee  When shared services was created, they looked at the funding we were spending on the items they would be accountable for. Our budget was reduced by that amount and the shared services budget was created by that amount—

Justice committee  —from a series of departments. Most of that funding would have been removed all across the board. A lot of it would have been from internal services but it would have been—

Justice committee  It was replaced last fiscal year.

Justice committee  So it wouldn't be an issue in these main estimates.

Justice committee  My understanding is it includes the supplementary estimates (A), (B), and (C). We had supplementary estimates (B) and (C) voted in the last fiscal year, 2012-13.