Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
April 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee The applicant.
April 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
April 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
April 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee Thank you for your question. A number of proposals in this bill will significantly help reinforce our efforts under way to improve the integrity of the citizenship program. You heard the minister speak earlier about changes to the requirements. For example, residence is one of
April 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee Thank you for your question. There's information on the department's website. You're quite correct in that a citizenship applicant can go to one of the third party test bodies that meet our criteria for tests to be equivalent with the Canadian language benchmark, CLB, level 4, w
April 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee I will answer the member's question, and I will invite my colleagues to add, should they wish. The member is quite correct that the renunciation provisions that are the subject of this bill apply to adults only. So even under the proposed amendments, for someone to be subject to
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee I would address your question in the following way with regard to avoiding situations of statelessness, which is a very important consideration for us, given our obligations under the 1961 convention to which Canada is a party, under which we have an obligation to ensure that we'
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee That's correct.
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee We were also deeply saddened by the tragic events. Speaking hypothetically, whether it's in the United States or any country abroad, if there's a situation where a Canadian who has another citizenship, as contemplated under the amendments of the bill, makes a conscious choice t
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee I can't really comment on that. That would be something that would be as a result of U.S. law, and for U.S. officials, our counterparts, to look at.
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee There are specific provisions in American legislation that contemplate loss of American citizenship for specific actions, but we're not experts on American law, so I'm not able to get to the detail of that.
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee I would answer that question by pointing to the fact that there is a limited and specific list of circumstances and categories under which a dual citizen, under the proposed amendments to the bill, could be subject to these provisions. I would seek to refute that comment and poin
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee The current legal grounds for taking away citizenship, as you've pointed out, are limited to revocation, and those apply only in cases of fraud by naturalized citizens. As you've rightly pointed out, under the 1947 act, there used to be provisions to take citizenship away from ci
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard
Citizenship and Immigration committee That's not correct, and I would note that other witnesses have made comments on this point. Citizenship is alienable. It's possible under the current Citizenship Act to take citizenship away. The revocation provisions exist for that reason, and the 1947 act had additional provisi
April 18th, 2013Committee meeting
Nicole Girard