Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-22 of 22
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  There are lots of issues with respect to implementing the Species at Risk Act. Our view is that the act does not need to be rewritten. The act itself is working well. It's really a question of implementing it. There have been challenges, and I certainly know that the Canadian W

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell

Environment committee  My first comment is that right now there is actually quite good collaboration among the levels of government, and particularly with the not-for-profit organizations who are working on the ground on the landscape, the folks like Nature Conservancy of Canada and Wildlife Habitat Ca

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell

Environment committee  It is pretty much lost. After the act has come into force, we now have less than 1% of the environmental assessments taking place than before, but that's a separate argument. I just want to say regarding the Mackenzie gas project that as part of that whole effort... and with thi

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell

Environment committee  We have some concerns with respect to how some federally managed lands are being managed. For example, national wildlife areas, which are a tremendous resource, are often overlooked. Most Canadians have never even heard of them, but the Canadian Wildlife Service manages almost as

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell

Environment committee  I think your question related to the fact that in a number of protected areas the surface rights are protected but not subsurface rights, and that obviously is an issue. That was the issue in Suffield, the fact that the subsurface rights were proposed for development. Let me st

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell

Environment committee  As I mentioned, this no net loss policy was developed by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans in 1986, in parallel with some changes to the Fisheries Act that protected fish habitat. In the most recent omnibus budget bill, those changes have largely been undone. However, the ch

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell

Environment committee  I wouldn't know. I would say that the no net loss policy is and has been an extremely important principle that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans has applied, and the policy does indicate that, yes, if development is going to destroy fish habitat, then by all means let's....

April 16th, 2013Committee meeting

Stephen Hazell