Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 251
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Chair, honourable members, it's a privilege to appear before the committee once again. Thank you. I believe that I understand the objectives set out in the bill, in light of the court's decision in Frank. I have read the presentation of the Chief Electoral Officer and review

May 12th, 2015Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Well, in point of fact I'm trying to address the perception that has been brought forth, which is in my view nothing but a perception, that there are problems with vouching by utilizing other sections of the bill, where it says that in these cases—impersonation, someone else havi

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I return to 307 others. All the leaders had the option, through all the people sitting in the House, to say no to any returning officer, and I just accepted that. I did not question it. If one leader said “no,” that returning officer was replaced.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Thank you, sir. I appreciated this.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Obviously, if a document is not available, is not reported on, then one cannot verify it, one cannot audit it. It is not part of what is to be...because this is what the bill proposes at this time, that this be excluded and not reported on; not only excluded, but not reported on.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Obviously, under the bill there's an additional week that the Chief Electoral Officer shall have at his disposal in order to start recruitment. In other words, candidates of the first and second party of the previous election will have one week less to nominate people. I think it

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  There is no gain, and it is a perpetuation of an unfortunate decision that was made in 2006, which really was not at all the issue that was debated at your predecessor committee, even though I reported on it. To me, it's ball game over on that one, and the change really does not

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In that particular context, yes it would.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  If one is able to design a system whereby these people are entitled to vote simply because they are there and they've been enumerated or revised onto the list during the very election, if one can devise such a system, then it handles that part of the matter.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It would help if the institution were to be compelled. I know some of them are hesitant, too busy, or whatever the reason. There's always a good reason for not doing the right thing in the minds of some people. They are part of the targeted revision, all the mobile poll areas, Al

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That is what I did. Insofar as any other rating, I'm waiting, because the minister has clearly stated that he wishes to move it up to A plus. Let us see what is done to move it up to A plus by the government and by the minister.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  If they don't make any changes is a theoretical question. I will address it when it is a reality.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'm afraid I don't know exactly the context of what you're quoting, so it's very difficult. I would not want to react artificially or superficially to something. I don't understand the context in which the remark was made.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I don't want to comment about the process that was followed to bring the bill forward, because my successor has done that. That is obviously the perspective of the Chief Electoral Officer in position, and I don't want to be commenting on that for the simple reason that he stated

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That is a judgment I shall have to reserve until I see what the changes are that you as a committee succeed in convincing the government about.

March 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley