Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 50
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

National Defence committee  I can try to explain by telling you about the difference between individual competencies and the competencies of a navy crew, instead of explaining the full capacity of a marine fleet.

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  The issues you described are based on the idea of fleet size and capacity. It is inevitable that frigates would make up over half of the fleet, but there is more to the fleet than just frigates. The smaller offshore patrol ships are very important to our current operations becaus

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  We are talking about a six-year period. With a five-year period, every vessel must go through a graving dock or a shipyard once every five years. That's typical. In a fleet of 12 frigates, for instance, it is normal for a quarter of them to be in a shipyard or at....

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  It is about a quarter.

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  Exactly. We have to find effective ways to deploy as many vessels as possible.

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  I would suggest that what an NPS offers us is an opportunity for a long-term commitment and long-term planning. I think that's a key element of the strategy. Certainly, like any major decision of the complexity that we're talking about, it's never a seamless or perfect execution

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  What I can say is that the plan is to deliver three classes of ship over the next almost 25 or 30 years, and that those ships will then serve for upwards of 30 years. They're being designed for a 30-year life. That's what we're engineering into the designs of the ships. This is r

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  I would have to go back and take that question—

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  I would agree that the budget has gone up, and I would agree that more money will buy you more.

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  I will be brief, Mr. Chair. I would say that there is no denying the degree to which there have been significant investments made in new capability over the last several years. I would also agree that the navy is very much looking forward to operationalizing—if I may use a milit

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  Well, thank you for the question. I....

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  I can't say that the ships themselves will last.

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  The consequences are fairly easy to describe. The retirement of current refuellers and the delay in the construction of joint support ships have led to capacity issues, which have a ripple effect. Owing to the capacity issues, Canada is unable to support and maintain those ships

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  Unfortunately, Ms. Michaud, it is not my place to offer an opinion on decisions related to acquisitions, operations and contracts in shipyards.

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman

National Defence committee  As I indicated in response to an earlier question, I think one of the key things to take into account, as we move into the Arctic in a more deliberate and sustained way, is that it is not just physical capability in terms of ships. The Arctic offshore patrol ships, the Harry DeWo

November 18th, 2014Committee meeting

VAdm Mark Norman