Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-26 of 26
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. The very practical effect of the bill, or this section of the bill, if passed, is that immediately there will be an adjustment of rates for roaming, which is one of the big inputs. To be honest, that will have some effect. Whether it'

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  If I may—and, Steve, you can certainly answer too—the market is so tied up with various factors. With spectrum having to be planned years ahead, and the complications with that, with tower-sharing not working the way Industry Canada I think intended at first, and with roaming onl

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  Yes, and since I'm here today speaking for Bruce as well, I really do. His point is one I meant to make during our remarks, which is that the roaming amendment will make it possible for regionals and new entrants to offer nationwide plans. That's where you get pricing pressure. B

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  Yes, I think that Mr. Moore faces quite the vehement opposition to some of the efforts he's made. It takes a lot of effort to change the course of things.

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  I think the chair of the CRTC has been very sanguine about this and has just said that they will take the bill into consideration, as they should, but that they are going to continue with their hearing. Listen, it's a difficult situation, I think, to be told that you have what

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  Sure. Thank you for the question. It's long been our position that more competition actually spurs investment because of a need to keep up with, as Geoff mentioned, innovative product offerings, and that the new entrants trying to break into the market now, or the regionals try

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  We completely share Mr. Anderson's point of view. In the areas with four players, the quality of service is approximately the same, if not superior, as Steve has mentioned. Problems with roaming fees are not necessarily tied to the quality of service received, unless calls are b

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  I'll start. The number one barrier to new entrants is the spectrum acquisition, not having a good result in the spectrum auction, say, for example in the most recent 700 megahertz. The second one is roaming. The third is tower-sharing. There are some other market elements, but t

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  Yes, that's correct. We do support the measure, but it's because of a lot of barriers and timing issues with getting new entrants the kind of toehold they need, so it's a necessary measure. I add that on the downstream question you gave to Steve, we also see competition coming fr

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, honourable members, my name is John Lawford, and I'm executive director and general counsel for the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, and I'm appearing today on behalf of both PIAC and the Consumers' Association of Canada. With me is Geoffrey Whi

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford

Industry committee  Our first point is that the rate formula in the bill, while a step in the right direction towards greater fairness in roaming rates, will pass on the high prices that incumbents can charge their own customers by virtue of their market power. There are a number of ways that telec

May 12th, 2014Committee meeting

John Lawford