Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 23
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Again, not arguing the merit of the intention of the change—

May 29th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  For sure. I think the challenge we have is that the discussion at the ag committee and the earlier change about wine, all that dealt with personal importations. This starts to get into the world of commercial importation. The discussions there provided an opportunity for the p

May 29th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  I guess, at the end of the day, we do our best with whatever legislation the House passes.

May 29th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  There isn't a set of regulations for this bill, I don't think. I'm not sure it's necessarily provided for, because it's a different kind of bill. But I'm not saying that's an absolute barrier either. It's just, again, there's been a shortage of time to assess what might or might

May 29th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  In fairness, given that I think we just learned about it on Friday, I don't know that we've really been able to fully assess it. I'm not being evasive, but because it gets us into the world of commercial, which was not a world that was considered over the last year when we were d

May 29th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  There isn't anything in the current bill that would speak to this, no.

May 29th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  To supplement what Richard said, it's actually a two-tiered penalty system. There's one if you're actually the business using it. That's a significant monetary penalty. There's also a very significant penalty if you're actually a producer, promoter, and purveyor of these instrume

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  I'll just make one observation after some 30 years in all of this, which is that probably no one's more offended when things like that happen to an organization than the people in the organization. There's probably nobody more dedicated to rooting it out and making sure it doesn'

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  Well....

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  The charity issue came up, and I spoke to the charity issue. I don't have knowledge as to whether it's that broad a statement. I can speak only to my own areas in terms of the charities. With regard to the issue of directing what I will call activities related to audit activitie

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  It's an internal decision based on a variety of information sources—letters from MPs, letters from individuals, and other charities.

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  Because they're confidential. It would be like you writing a letter to the CRA. We don't make that public. If you choose to make it public, that's fine.

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  Yes, in the sense that we always look at the tolerances and thresholds. In fact, in budget 2014, there's a provision that's focused on small business and others to adjust the thresholds in terms of payment frequencies. We're always looking to adjust the system to fine-tune it, an

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley

Finance committee  I don't know that we track this. I do know that we have obviously the issue of residency and that has a difference, as you well know, in terms of the actual tax rate you're paying, and so on. I don't know the degree to which our stats shop, which shares a lot of information with

May 28th, 2014Committee meeting

Brian McCauley