Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Industry committee Yes.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee That's correct.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee I'm not aware one way or the other whether they're having problems with these provisions.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee That's correct, but as I've stated, the thresholds issue particularly makes me concerned that organizations would be able to share information for potential breaches or fraud cases that may not have materialized. That is a concern, a very real concern for me.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee I have no information to that effect, no.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee No, I would disagree with that. I think there is a fairly big difference between the proposed regime which would be authorizing organizations to share information for the purpose of investigating potential breaches versus the current regime where information can be shared only wh
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee “Likely” refers to a potential breach, so a breach that in the eyes of the organization is likely to occur but has not yet been seen.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee At the end of the day, I think the difference is between allowing organizations to share for potential breaches not yet seen versus the current regime which requires that the breach has been seen or is occurring. There is a big difference in my opinion.
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Industry committee There is an annual meeting of federal and provincial privacy commissioners. We do work jointly on a regular basis. Guidance is often provided jointly so that there is consistency in what organizations receive. So absolutely, we work in a very cooperative fashion with provincial
February 17th, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Finance committee Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee, for the invitation to address you today. The subject of your study, Canada's regime for combatting the financing of terrorism, is clearly a timely one. As you are aware, in light of Bill C-51 and other recent legislative activi
March 31st, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Finance committee On that point, I'm not sure about an international comparison, but in terms of oversight of national security agencies writ large, whether for terrorist financing or other activities, Canada certainly has a number of review bodies for the RCMP, for CSIS, and for the Security Esta
March 31st, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Finance committee I guess my concern is that in gathering massive amounts of information to identify suspicious transactions, government receives, analyzes, and retains for long periods a lot of information about law-abiding citizens.
March 31st, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Finance committee The information I was referring to was uncovered in the course of our two-year review audits that we've conducted over the years. Essentially, the problems stem from the discretionary criteria applied by financial institutions and providing information to FINTRAC, namely, that a
March 31st, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Finance committee I don't want to exaggerate the importance of the problem, but we did find occurrences of reporting by financial institutions to FINTRAC that appeared to be based in part on race, place of destination, and age.
March 31st, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Finance committee To distinguish between the current laws as they apply to FINTRAC and Bill C-51, current laws, some of which are being revisited or reconsidered including the dollar threshold, to me are reasonable because reporting to FINTRAC is either on the basis of whether a transaction is sus
March 31st, 2015Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien