Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Finance committee Yes, absolutely, and more employer engagement is even better.
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Finance committee The more money the company has in-house to reinvest in training and in productivity gains, the better. Our members are all small businesses. Anything you can do to enhance the small business deduction would be extremely helpful in those circumstances, in order to give an incentiv
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Finance committee Absolutely.
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Finance committee We have 17,000.
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Finance committee Just so I understand your question, you're talking with respect to finding additional funding options for public infrastructure or...?
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Finance committee One of the things I think we have to do with respect to public-private partnerships is get the transactional cost down. Right now, because they are so expensive to deal with because of the legal agreements, complexities, etc., you need a minimum threshold of project size or value
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Finance committee Extend EDC's domestic powers: that's a big help to our firms getting involved in those large financing arrangements.
October 17th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. We'd like to thank the committee for providing the Canadian Construction Association, the CCA, with the opportunity to appear before you today. Our association represents the non-residential sector of the construction industry, so we, in fact, bui
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee On the percentage, or what the appropriate percentage is, I think it's very difficult to provide that. It depends on the need and the type of project and its complexity, it depends upon the kind of infrastructure. That really is a function of the identified priorities, but it doe
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee I would agree that it doesn't make much sense to force parties to make that decision right up front, without having a further evaluation done. It would be kind of foolish to burn bridges during that process. To have a more integrated approach makes a lot of sense. Mr. Carlton wo
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee The consideration shouldn't only be, when you're looking at a complex project, whether or not it's a viable option for private financing. I think you should be looking at the domestic market, your supply chain. You should be making other considerations in coming to that decision.
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee In many cases they would still be engaged, particularly if they're trade contractors—mechanical, electrical, etc. It would just be that they may be working for somebody other than they would normally be working for, or there would be another layer of contracts between them, which
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee Yes, and there is a role for SMEs in P3 partnerships. If you look at a typical construction contract, with a general or prime contractor and a number of subcontractors and a number of sub-subs below them, and suppliers, etc., and you look at it as a pyramid, the group most affect
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson
Government Operations committee Our organization welcomes that kind of scrutiny. To some extent, on the second round of P3 projects that we've seen over the last 10 years or so, it's too early in the game to do an objective assessment of that, because you're talking about the total life-cycle management cost. Y
October 18th, 2012Committee meeting
Michael Atkinson