Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 68
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources committee  GIC has never sought to tell the board to regulate an interprovincial line.

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  That's right...ask them.

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  Most Canadian electricity exports come from the provinces that are hydro-dominated: B.C., Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec, most of all. It is largely the hydro we are exporting.

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  That really falls outside the role of the NEB. It's not something I could comment on.

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  Maybe I'll just make one clarification. It's 95% or more of hydro in those provinces, because some of them are 99% or 98%.

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  I didn't hear it.

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  I didn't hear the question, but I think that by 2030 there will be almost no coal-fired power generation in Canada. Most of that is because provinces have said they are going off coal. The cost isn't even the key thing. The key thing is the policy saying we are going off coal by

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  We did two scenarios. One scenario has carbon pricing in Canada going up to $50 in 2022, similar to the pan-Canadian framework. The other one has it continuing to rise by $5 a year after that. In both of those cases, we actually increase our consumption of natural gas for power g

October 18th, 2017Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  That's correct.

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  There's rail-loading capacity for 1.1 million.

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  We haven't seen a study comparing the environmental impacts that would fall out of that constrained case. When we look at the 1.2 million barrels a day for rail, we have rail loading capacity of just under 1.1 million barrels a day now. And that has been added since 2011, when

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  A yes or no does it? It doesn't look like an unrealistic forecast to have 1.2 million barrels a day moving by rail, but there are uncertainties to it. In North Dakota they are moving—

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  The industry is certainly looking at and has its eyes on Asia as a potential opportunity. More than 99% of our oil goes to the United States, and as the United States has almost doubled its own oil production since 2008, markets are certainly looking towards Asia.

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  First of all, I haven't read the report itself, so I can't comment on it. With respect to these forecasts and how that might differ from what's there, these forecasts were locked down last August, and since that time there's been a tremendous amount of activity in Canada with res

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic

Natural Resources committee  Well, it's hard to imagine that those trajectories for fossil fuel use aren't going to come down, but we'll see the extent of it when we see what the modelling results in.

May 30th, 2016Committee meeting

Shelley Milutinovic