Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 39
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  I was just going to comment that we do not use 99.9% of the ocean. Fishing only takes place in certain areas of the coast.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  I think it was on the second map that I talked about the fisheries closures that were in place in 2012 to 2016. The purple areas are what are referred to as “rockfish conservation areas”. I believe you've had several witnesses refer to them. Between 1999 and 2007 they were implemented, or phased in over time, to protect inshore rockfish and inshore rockfish habitat.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  As part of a comprehensive program, a rockfish conservation strategy includes reducing TACs and increasing monitoring in the commercial fishery to try to reduce fishing mortalities with inshore rockfish species.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  No. For the fifth map, we've put on there areas that have been identified for protection in other processes that did not include the federal government or fisheries, but are now on the table as part of the MPA network planning in the northern shelf bioregion. They're from marine plans that were developed in a separate process, but they're now on the table for consideration.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  As I say, if some, not all, of those areas that were identified for protection were implemented, it would devastate our fishery. As you can see, some of the key areas are affected.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  In the current form, yes, it would devastate our fishery.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  I would say that would depend on the objective of the area, what you're trying to achieve, the goals, and where the area is located. As I said, and I made it clear, I don't think the industry and our members are opposed to MPAs and protecting things. MPAs are one tool in the tool kit to help you achieve your objectives.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  We've been harvesting halibut off the west coast of Canada since the late 1880s. Right now, every year there is an independent survey done, and it shows that the health of the resource in Canada is quite healthy.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  I would disagree. I don't think the socio-economic analysis, the value data, the information that DFO has is sufficient. A lot of work needs to be done to truly understand the value of the fisheries and the activities in the area. They need to look at the cumulative impacts, not just at each different initiative in isolation, so that people can understand what the impacts are together.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  I have a master's degree in economics. I used to work with economists in Fisheries and Oceans Canada, so I am aware of what socio-economic analysis is done and can be done and should be done. Thank you.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  I'll speak to our group. I think some processes we have been part of have worked well. Then, as was pointed out by one of the speakers, stakeholders need to be bound to a collective decision. We've gone through a process, and all of a sudden we've seen people trying to get in on the process.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  Thank you. My name is Chris Sporer. I'm with the Pacific Halibut Management Association, which represents the majority of commercial halibut licence-holders on Canada's Pacific coast. I'd like to thank the committee for the opportunity to speak to you today as part of your study of the criteria and process being used to identify and establish marine protected areas in Canada.

June 15th, 2017Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  That's a big question. The science is done each year by the International Pacific Halibut Commission. There has been a treaty in place since 1923, where an international body does the science and sets the TACs for Canada and the U.S., and then each country manages its fishery respectively.

April 21st, 2015Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  Commercial is probably in the.... We classify it as 10-20, 20-40, 40-60, and 60-plus. In terms of an average weight, I don't have one off the top of my head. I could certainly provide that for you. I just don't have it on hand, but it would be more than that.

April 21st, 2015Committee meeting

Chris Sporer

Fisheries committee  Yes, that's a good point. For halibut, the larger females produce more eggs, so you want to try to leave those larger females in there. The size and age of halibut have dropped on the west coast, here in Alaska and B.C., but you do want to avoid the big females if you can. A lot of people do want to target a trophy fish in the recreational fishery.

April 21st, 2015Committee meeting

Chris Sporer