Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Pay Equity committee I'll begin, and I'll defer to my colleagues if they have more detail. In my view, it would be a melding of the models that are out there right now. We know there are these three models—Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba—that have now been working for quite some time. It would make se
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee Right.
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee It's around that.
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee Yes. As I say, we would look to the models that are in existence in these provincial jurisdictions, where timelines are set out, time frames for compliance with the legislation. Then there are requirements about wage adjustments. It is all set out in the legislation, and everybod
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee At this point, then, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board is applying section 11 of our act, the section we used to apply through the complaints model. Since 2009, the PSLREB is applying section 11 of our act. That would change under the Public Sector Equitabl
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee Are you suggesting PSECA is a proactive model, or are you just asking for the differences between PSECA and what occurs under our legislation?
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee As we understand it, under PSECA, equitable compensation, as it's referred to under that legislation, would be dealt with through collective bargaining as opposed to, under our process, through complaints. That would be one difference. We understand that under PSECA after collec
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee We don't know. Under PSECA, for example, there is a regulation-making power, and we don't know what those regulations would be in terms of how the process would unfold. Depending on how those regulations would be drafted, they could impact on the result. To be clear, we're not
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine
Pay Equity committee Thank you, Madam Chair. Honourable members, good evening. Thank you for inviting the Canadian Human Rights Commission to take part in this discussion about pay equity in the federal jurisdiction. Our chief commissioner Marie-Claude Landry sends her regrets for not being here
April 18th, 2016Committee meeting
Ian Fine